|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example cases |
|
|
A. Human genetic diseases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Infectious diseases |
|
|
1. HIV/AIDS |
| Introduction to HIV and Introduction to African cases | |
| . | U.S. cases - Anna, Katrice, Laverne, Doug, Lisa, Jennifer, Steve, Marie |
| African cases - Nicole, Auxilia, Marie, Tendayi, Safari | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. Ebola |
|
| 6. Salmonella |
|
| 7. Sexually-transmitted
diseases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Forensics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Phylogenetic studies |
|
|
1. Primate
relationships - human, chimp, gorilla |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Simulation of wet labs |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Mapping
of bacteriophage T7 DNA |
|
|
|
Cases
developed by Karen Klyczek,
Kim Mogen, and Douglas Johnson, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, and Mary
Lundeberg, Michigan State University. Case It software developed by Mark Bergland
and Karen Klyczek. Contact mark.s.bergland@uwrf.edu
for additional information. This project
was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors
and not necessarily those of the Foundation.
Copyright 2006
.
| Note: Video cases for HIV, formally only available with the Case It Investigator download, are now accessible via this online version of the Resource Manual. |
The example cases described
here were developed for use in introductory undergraduate biology classes to
help students deal with concepts and issues in molecular biology, but they can
be adapted to a variety of educational settings.
Each case description includes
the case scenario and instructions for analyzing the case, as well as background
information and discussion questions. The cases can be presented to students using
this format, having them read the background information and perhaps do some
additional research, then carry out the analysis, interpret the results and
discuss the significance and the issues raised.
Alternatively, instructors can edit the cases to add or omit information
as appropriate for the backgrounds of students and the course objectives. Students may be required to:
• focus on the ethical and social issues raised by the analysis
and the decision-making process involved.
• take on a particular role, e.g. genetic counselor or family member,
and present the case interpretation from that
perspective.
• develop hypotheses about the results, based on the background
information about the molecular biology in the case, before running the analysis
• start with the case analysis and results, and carry out their
own research to obtain information necessary to interpret the case.
In addition to using these
cases and sequences, the module allows instructors to develop their own cases
using DNA and protein sequences obtained from GenBank or elsewhere (see "Building
your own case"). Sequences,
restriction enzyme sites, probes, primers and antibodies all are editable text
files. Case development also can be assigned to students
in more advanced biology courses. The
student-designed cases then can be subjected to peer review via poster presentations,
etc. and used by students in introductory courses.
Example
cases
The DNA and protein sequences
for the cases described here are located in the Cases folder that is downloaded
with the Case It! Software simulation. The necessary enzymes, probes, antibodies, or
proteins for a particular case will be located in the same folder as the DNA
sequences.
A. Human genetic diseases
Genetic diseases are caused
by alterations in the DNA which result in loss of function or altered function
of a protein. These changes in the
DNA can be detected, even in the absence of disease symptoms, by isolating
DNA from the patient and using restriction enzyme digestion and Southern blotting.
The following examples illustrate different types of DNA alterations
associated with human genetic diseases.
[A note about terminology:
The term “normal” is generally used to refer to DNA samples or probes
without the disease mutation, i.e. the normal or most common sequence for
this DNA. No value judgment regarding individuals who
have inherited the disease-associated mutations is intended or implied.]
Background: Sickle
cell anemia is a disease of red blood cells. It is caused by a mutation in the hemoglobin
gene. A single base change results
in a single amino acid substitution. This
mutation causes the hemoglobin to change its conformation to a more elongated
form under certain conditions, distorting the red blood cells and impairing
their ability to carry oxygen. Sickle
cell anemia is considered a recessive trait, since both chromosomes have to
carry the mutation in order for the full blown disease symptoms to appear.
The sickle cell mutation
also eliminates a restriction enzyme site - the recognition site for the enzyme
MstII. To detect the sickle cell mutation,
a patient’s DNA is digested with MstII and a Southern blot is performed using
a probe corresponding to this region of the hemoglobin gene. The presence or absence of the sickle cell mutation
can be determined based on the size of the fragment identified by the probe.
Case A: Steve
and Martha are expecting their second child. They know that sickle cell anemia runs in both
of their families. They want to know
whether this child could be affected. Neither
they nor their 10-year-old daughter, Sarah, have shown any symptoms of the
disease. They decide to have DNA tests
to determine the status of the fetus, as well as to find out whether they
in fact are carriers of the disease gene.
DNA samples: Steve (father)
Martha (mother)
Sarah (daughter)
Fetus
Control DNA, homozygous for sickle cell mutation
Control DNA, homozygous normal, without sickle cell mutation
Digest each of these DNA
samples with MstII. Then run a Southern
blot, using the probe corresponding to the region of the hemoglobin gene mutated
in sickle cell anemia, to determine the genotype of each individual.
a. What conclusions
can you draw from the results?
b. What is the molecular
basis of this disease, and why does this result in the observed gel patterns?
c. What options are
available to the family?
d.
What issues are
raised by this type of testing?
Case B: Mattie has just returned
form the hospital after visiting KC, her favorite nephew. She and her family are already grieving the
loss they know is coming. She has watched
her only brother, Josiah, and his wife, Emma, deal with KC’s illness over
the years. She feels as helpless for
them as she does for KC. Josiah shook
her up when he blurted out, during a period of overwhelming stress, that if
they had known ahead of time, perhaps they would have chosen a different route,
and that she should get tested to avoid the same suffering. Mattie knew it was the stress talking, and that
Josiah would not trade any of his moments with KC, but maybe he was right
about her. Maybe she should go into
parenting with her eyes open. Maybe
she should find out if she could bear a child with sickle cell anemia.
DNA samples: Mattie (sister)
Josiah (brother)
KC (nephew)
Emma (wife)
Control DNA, homozygous for sickle cell mutation
Control
DNA, homozygous normal, without sickle cell mutation
Digest each of these DNA
samples with MstII. Then run a Southern
blot, using the probe corresponding to the region of the hemoglobin gene mutated
in sickle cell anemia, to determine the genotype of each individual.
a. What chance does
Mattie have to bear a child with sickle cell anemia?
b. What other conclusions
can you draw from the results?
c. What is the molecular basis of this disease,
and why does this result in the observed gel patterns?
d. What issues are
raised by this type of testing?
Case C: Claudine and Andre Kasonga
live in a small community in sub-Sahara Africa, surrounded by family and friends
whose children frequently suffer from malaria or sickle cell anemia.
They themselves have both had siblings succumb to each of these diseases.
While they both appear to be fine, they are expecting their first child
and wish to know how to prepare themselves.
Should they move away from the malaria-carrying mosquitoes, or wouldn’t
it matter? They decide to get tested.
DNA samples: Claudine(mother)
Andre (father)
Fetus
Control DNA, homozygous for sickle cell mutation
Control DNA, homozygous normal, without sickle cell mutation
Digest each of these DNA
samples with MstII. Then run a Southern
blot, using the probe corresponding to the region of the hemoglobin gene mutated
in sickle cell anemia,6p to determine the genotype of each individual.
a.
What is the connection
between the malaria-carrying parasite and sickle cell anemia?
b.
Under what fetal
genetic conditions would it make sense to move out of the area where malaria
is endemic?
c.
What conclusions
can you draw from the results?
d. What is the molecular basis of this disease,
and why does this result in the observed gel patterns?
e. What options are
available to the family?
f. What issues are
raised by this type of testing?
Background: Huntington’s
chorea is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor, cognitive, and
emotional symptoms. The age of onset
for symptoms is generally 30-50 years. The genetic basis of the disease is an amplification
in a gene with an (as yet) unknown function.
A triplet (CAG) is repeated 20-50 times in asymptomatic individuals;
having more than 50 repeats is associated with disease symptoms. This amplification can be detected by restriction
enzyme digestion and Southern blot analysis, since the size of the fragment
bound by the probe is increased as a result of the amplification of the triplet
repeat. Huntington’s disease is considered
a dominant disorder, since one copy of the amplified gene appears to be sufficient
to cause disease symptoms.
Case A: Susan
is a 23-year-old whose father, age 55, and paternal aunt, age 61, have been
diagnosed with Huntington’s chorea. A
paternal uncle, age 66, appears to be unaffected by the disease. Susan wants to know if she inherited the mutated
gene from her father so that she can prepare for that future if necessary.
She arranges to undergo DNA testing for Huntington’s disease.
Her 17-year old brother, John, also decides to be tested after talking
with Susan.
DNA samples: Susan (patient)
Father (affected)
Aunt (affected)
Uncle (unaffected)
John (brother)
Control DNA with HD mutation
Control DNA, normal (without HD mutation)
Digest the DNA samples
with EcoRI, and then perform a Southern blot with the Huntington’s probe. By comparing the sizes of the fragments bound
by the probe, determine the Huntington’s gene status of Susan and her brother.
a. What conclusions
can you draw from these results?
b. What is the molecular
basis of this disease, and why does this result in the observed gel patterns?
c. How would you counsel
Susan and her brother based on the results of the test?
d. What issues are
raised by this type of testing?
Case B: Josiah and Eldrea were worried about their 52-year-old
father. He was starting to act sometimes
like this older brother, their uncle Theo. Theo was 15 years older than their father and
he had been recently diagnosed with Huntington disease. After speaking with the family physician they
learned a diagnostic DNA test was available.
They wanted to their father to have the test, and they decided they
should take it themselves so that they can better prepare for their future.
DNA samples: father
uncle Theo
Josiah
Eldrea
Control DNA, normal
(without HD mutation)
Digest the DNA samples
with EcoRI, and then perform a Southern blot with the Huntington’s probe. By comparing the sizes of the fragments bound
by the probe, determine the Huntington’s gene status of Susan and her brother.
a. What conclusions
can you draw from the results?
b. What
is the molecular basis of this disease, and why does this result in the observed
gel patterns?
c. What options are
available to the family?
d. What issues are
raised by this type of testing?
Case C: Forty-four year old Jerry is haunted by the
specter of Huntington disease. It took
his grandmother, a favorite uncle, and now he sees signs of motor impairment
in his 67-year-old mother, Sophie. He
worries that he might have inherited the disease and wonders, too, if he may
have passed it to any of his 3 children. After
several late night family discussions, a date is set for them to provide samples
for DNA testing. While he is certain
he and his mother should be tested, he wonders if his children are making
the right choice.
DNA samples: Sophie (mother)
Jerry (father)
22-year-old son
19-year-old daughter
18-year-old son
Control DNA with HD mutation
Control DNA, normal (without
HD mutation)
Digest the DNA samples
with EcoRI, and then perform a Southern blot with the Huntington’s probe. By comparing the sizes of the fragments bound
by the probe, determine the Huntington’s gene status of Susan and her brother.
a. What conclusions can you draw from the results?b. What is the molecular basis of this disease, and why does this result in the observed gel patterns?c. What options are available to the family?d. What issues are raised by this type of testing?
3. Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy
Background: One form
of inherited muscular dystrophy, Duchenne’s, is X-linked and therefore affects
primarily males. The symptoms of Duchenne's
muscular dystrophy (DMD) include progressive and severe skeletal muscle weakness.
A common mutation associated with DMD is a deletion of one or more
exons in the dystrophin gene. These
deletions can be detected by restriction enzyme digestion and Southern blotting
using a combination of probes that will bind to multiple dystrophin exons.
Case A: Jean
and Bill have three sons, ages 12, 8, and 7, and a daughter, age 6.
The oldest son and daughter are healthy, but the two younger sons are
exhibiting symptoms of muscle weakness consistent with early muscular dystrophy.
Jean knows that she has a family
history of muscular dystrophy, but she does not know whether she is a carrier
of the disease gene. She seeks DNA
testing to determine whether her younger sons may have inherited the form
of the dystrophin gene associated with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD).
DNA samples: Jean (mother)
oldest son (unaffected)
daughter
8-year-old son (possibly affected)
7-year-old son (possibly affected)
Digest each DNA sample with HindIII, then perform a Southern blot with the dystrophin gene probe (DMD probe). Based on the number and sizes of the fragments bound by the probe, determine the status of each of the individuals tested. (Hint: